In this installment: a drunken work party leads to a mishap; a
too-delicious sandwich causes a dangerous distraction; and a snack customer has
a cheesy encounter.
Dear
STB:
My
boss held a get-together for junior executives last week at his home. I’m not clear on whether it was an “official”
work event. The invitations were only
verbal, and he mentioned to a friend of mine that he was paying for it out of
his own pocket. But my peers made it
clear to me that it wouldn’t look good not to go. Drinks were flowing, and I felt pressure to
participate in that, too. I had a bit
too much, and on the way home I ran my car into a tree. The car got totaled, and I suffered some broken
bones. Can I sue?
--Tipsy in Topeka
Dear
Tipsy:
Fortunately,
we live in a society where average, everyday Americans are no longer held
responsible for their own decisions and actions, especially if there are deep
pockets around. And there’s been plenty
of case law on this one. If you felt work
pressure to attend this event, and other employees were going, there’s a strong
argument to be made that this was an official work function, regardless of who
bought the booze. As such, your employer
had a duty to ensure the safety of its workers, and this meant paying attention
to how much alcohol was flowing.
Absolutely: Sue the Bastards.
Dear
STB:
My
favorite fast food joint unveiled a new barbecue rib sandwich last week. I ordered one at the drive through
window. After I pulled back into
traffic, when I bit into the sandwich, it was so delicious that my eyes rolled
up into my head. Unfortunately, just as
that happened, the driver of the car in front of me slammed on her brakes to
avoid a squirrel. My car rear-ended
hers. Both vehicles were dinged up
pretty good. I suffered burns on my arms
and face from the airbag, and she wound up in a neck brace. To make matters worse, I got a ticket, and
now she’s coming after me for legal damages.
I feel the fast food company was responsible for my distraction. Can I sue?
--Dinged in Denver
Dear
Dinged:
See
my comments above about the happy state of personal responsibility in our
country. The legal ground in your
particular case is less certain than in the one above. But your point is well taken. It’s significant that the restaurant is
selling this item at the drive-through window, knowing full well that customers
will be pulling into traffic and driving as they sample it. A case can be made that they knew, or should
have known, that their mouth-watering new entrée, when consumed in such a
fashion, could cause a major distraction.
I say, Sue the Bastards.
Dear
STB:
I
bought a box of cheese crackers the other day.
When I got it home and opened it, I was shocked to see that it was only
half full. I felt like I’d been ripped
off. But when I took it back to the
store where I bought it and demanded a refund, the manager told me to take a
hike. Can I sue?
-- P.O.’ed in Poughkeepsie
Dear
P.O.’ed:
This
is a classic scenario, but unfortunately, that means this field has already
been well plowed. Because of past litigation, most boxes
containing dry foods of this sort bear a disclaimer reading something like
this: “This package is sold by weight,
not by volume. If it does not appear
full when opened, it is because contents have settled during shipping and
handling.” In many cases, disclaimers of
this nature indicate that an issue has been previously litigated, and the
disclaimer is part of the settlement. In
most cases, you can find the disclaimer written in very tiny print and tucked
out of sight on the bottom of the box. You
might reasonably ask what good a warning written and hidden in that fashion
might be to anyone. And morally, you
might have a point. But not legally. The warning is sufficient for legal
purposes. This means you’re out of
luck. Now if, after searching the box,
you don’t find such a disclaimer, you may have a case. And one other option is to weigh the contents
to make sure they come up to the total promised on the front of the box. But honestly, neither step is likely to lead
to results in your favor. Reluctantly,
in your case I have to say that as good as it would feel, it would probably be
a waste of your time and money to Sue the Bastards.
If you’d like to see more writing
along these lines, check out my novel Messages, which shows the
same degree of respect to the news industry.
The Sue the Bastards blog is
offered as satire only. The author is
not a lawyer, has received no legal education, and specifically disavows that
this blog constitutes legal advice or should be followed as such. The author does state that the need to
include such a disclaimer proves a point about the litigious nature of our
society. So there.
###
If you enjoyed this, please share with your friends. You can find more snarkograms here. My well-reviewed novel Messages, a TV news exposé and crime drama, is written largely in this style. And I invite you to subscribe to this blog.
©2014 by Forrest Carr. All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment